ST25TV02K vs ST25DV64K
Tag vs TagStandard NFC vs dual-interface dynamic tag.
ST25TV02K vs ST25DV64K
Two HF RFID chips from STMicroelectronics at 13.56 MHz, both with RFID tags." data-category="Data & Encoding">user memory beyond standard tags, but designed for fundamentally different applications. ST25TV02K is a security/anti-tamper chip; ST25DV64K is a dual-interface IoT component with large storage.
Overview
ST25TV02K (TV series: tamper+validation) targets brand protection and anti-counterfeit applications with its tamper-detect antenna loop, ECDSA digital signature, and 2 Kbit user memory. ST25DV64K (DV series: dual-interface) is an IoT bridge component with 64 Kbits of memory accessible via both coupling RFID standard." data-category="Standards & Protocols">ISO 15693 RF and I2C wired interfaces, plus energy harvesting. Both are ISO 15693-compliant and readable by standard HF RFID readers, but they serve different system architectures.
Key Differences
- Memory: ST25TV02K has 2,048 bits (256 bytes) of user memory. ST25DV64K has 65,536 bits (8,192 bytes) — 32 times more. For applications needing large on-tag data, ST25DV64K is in a different class.
- Tamper detection: ST25TV02K has a breakable tamper-detect antenna loop that permanently alters the tag's readable state when severed — enabling single-use seal applications. ST25DV64K has no tamper detection capability.
- Digital signature: ST25TV02K generates an ECDSA signature allowing a backend to verify chip authenticity. ST25DV64K has password-based memory protection but no cryptographic signature capability.
- Dual interface: ST25DV64K provides both ISO 15693 (RF) and I2C (wired) access to the same 8 KB memory bank. An MCU can update data over I2C while an NFC reader retrieves it over RF. ST25TV02K is RF-only.
- Energy harvesting: ST25DV64K can supply up to 3 mA from the RF field via Vout. ST25TV02K has no energy harvesting.
- Form factor: ST25TV02K is available in inlay/label format suitable for pressure-sensitive labels. ST25DV64K is primarily available in SO8N/TSSOP8 IC packages for PCB integration, less suited for label-grade deployment.
- Cost: ST25TV02K is priced for label-scale deployment. ST25DV64K is priced for module/PCB integration and is considerably more expensive per unit.
Use Cases
ST25TV02K suits: - Anti-counterfeit labels on pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, spirits, and luxury goods. - Tamper-evident seals where physical opening must be permanently detectable. - Brand protection programmes using ECDSA signature verification via smartphone app. - Single-use authentication seals on warranty cards, secure parcels, and regulated documents.
ST25DV64K suits: - IoT sensor nodes with MCU access over I2C and external NFC readout. - Smart packaging with large data payloads (full product certificates, multilingual content, firmware configuration). - Applications requiring energy harvesting from the RF field to power a connected circuit. - Development and prototyping of NFC-connected embedded systems.
Verdict
ST25TV02K and ST25DV64K are not alternatives — they are built for different system architectures. If you need a tamper-evident, cryptographically authenticated label for brand protection, choose ST25TV02K. If you need a wired+wireless shared memory component with large storage and optional energy harvesting in an embedded system, choose ST25DV64K. Attempting to use ST25DV64K as an anti-tamper label is impractical (wrong form factor, no tamper loop); attempting to use ST25TV02K as an IoT bridge is impossible (no I2C, no energy harvesting).
Preguntas frecuentes
Each comparison provides a side-by-side analysis of two RFID tag ICs or technologies, covering memory capacity, read sensitivity, read range, protocol features, pricing, and recommended applications. A summary recommendation helps you quickly decide which option fits your requirements.
Cross-technology comparisons evaluate RFID against other identification technologies such as barcodes, QR codes, NFC, BLE beacons, and GPS. These help you decide whether RFID is the right technology for your use case or if a combination approach would be more effective.